If i were in Pennsylvania next week, i’d be here.
(0)Monthly Archive for March, 2006
i believe that after i finish my series on “What is ‘Emergent’” (started here) , i want to do two “big” series along with some “smaller” series. First, i want to discuss knowledge, truth, and belief in a series on epistemology. i believe that will be a good starting point for other posts/series. After that, i want to do a series on language (well, actually, i have the makings of a beginning of that here) and interpretation.
Then, i’d like to move on and discuss Calvinism/Reformed Theology. i believe that it centers on two foci: “TULIP” and the 5 solas. So, i’d like to discuss each piece separately, then them as an entirety. By then, i believe i will have discussed enough to re-visit the “What is ‘Emergent’” series in a “Postmodernism and Christianity” series.
i am sorry if this sounds really boring, but i wanted to write it down somewhere that i can retrieve pretty easily…And now back to your regularly scheduled blog.
Chris Tilling has been writing a good series on the concept of biblical inerrancy:
Post 1
Post 2
Post 3 (intro)
Post 3
Post 4
Post 5
Post Final
i have to agree with much of what Chris has said. Personally, i don’t find claiming inerrancy to be beneficial to a Christian–both in the Christian’s personal relation to Christ and the Christian’s social relations to Christians and non-Christians. It makes the focus of a Christian’s faith the subject of the Bible (the written words) and not Christ (the Word of God).
